Sample · stand-in data · illustrative

This is what an Evaluation Report looks like.

Below is an example Evaluation Report from a realistic Bremerton, WA single-family FHA scenario. The names and addresses are made up; it's here to show the shape of what a check returns — the findings, the citations, and the fixes.

Before you scroll

The report below is long — about three printed pages. Most of what makes it useful happens in three places. If you're skimming, these are the ones to read:

  • Section 3 (Findings detail). The actual catches: one critical finding (lead-paint missing on a pre-1978 property) plus two material ones. Each has the citation, plain-English message, and an improvement recommendation.
  • Section 4 (Improvement guidance, ranked). The consolidated to-do list ordered by what would block your deal versus what would slow it down.
  • The closing note. The wording that keeps you safe: what the check does tell you, and what it deliberately doesn't.
Athena Systems North Star

Evaluation Report

Point-in-time compliance check

Generated 2026-04-15

1. Subject and assignment

Subject 1247 Elm Street, Bremerton, WA 98310 — single-family, built 1962
Jurisdiction US-WA (Washington)
Rule sets FHA Handbook 4000.1 · ANSI Z765 · USPAP · Washington state licensing
Generated 2026-04-15

2. Findings summary

ResultCount
Non-compliant — must fix; a rule failed at material or critical severity 3
Needs attention — an advisory point to consider 1
Compliant — rules that fired and passed 38
Total rules evaluated 42
Not applicable — applicability gate didn't match this submission 365
Action required. This submission has critical-severity findings. Resolve them before delivering the report to the lender.

3. Findings detail

Critical FED-FHA-4000-1-II-D-5-LEAD-PAINT

Lead-based-paint assessment present on pre-1978 property

HUD-4000-1 Section II.D.5 — source

Subject was built in 1962. FHA Handbook 4000.1, Section II.D.5 requires a lead-based-paint assessment for any property constructed before 1978. The submitted workfile does not record a value for content.subject_property.lead_paint_assessment. The deal cannot proceed to closing until either (a) the appraiser certifies no defective paint, or (b) defective paint is documented with a remediation plan.

Improvement guidance. Add the lead-paint assessment to the URAR addendum. Use one of the three accepted values: no_defective_paint (no chipping / peeling observed on a building component); defective_paint_with_repair_plan (observed defects + remediation scope documented and bid); defective_paint_undocumented (observed but no plan — will block FHA insurance). Photograph any observed defects.

Material FED-FHA-4000-1-II-D-3-COMPARABLE-RECENCY

Closed comparables are within 12 months of effective date (or older comps are explained)

HUD-4000-1 Section II.D.3 — source

Comparable Sale #3 (953 Pine Avenue) closed 2024-12-08, more than 16 months before the effective date. The workfile's comparable_sales_within_12_months boolean is false and no per-comp age explanation is recorded. FHA Section II.D.3 expects closed comparables within 12 months; older comps are permitted only when the addendum justifies the choice (e.g., rural / low-volume market).

Improvement guidance. Either substitute Comp #3 with a closer-in-time sale (preferable — the West Bremerton submarket has had adequate transaction volume in the trailing 12 months), or add a per-comp narrative explaining the selection: why this older comp is more locationally / physically similar than any alternative within the 12-month window. The narrative goes in the URAR addendum and the workfile's per-comp age_explanation field is then populated.

Material ANSI-Z765-METHOD-DECLARED

GLA is measured and reported under the ANSI Z765-2021 method

ANSI Z765-2021 — GLA measurement standard (applies to Conventional and FHA).

The submitted workfile includes a floor-plan sketch, but the content.report.ansi_z765_method_declared flag is false and no per-area dimension table is recorded. ANSI Z765-2021 — the measurement standard that applies to this FHA assignment — requires the report to state that gross living area was measured under ANSI and to show the supporting dimensions.

Improvement guidance. Declare the ANSI Z765-2021 method in the report and add the GLA calculation as a supplementary exhibit alongside the existing floor-plan sketch. Show dimensions per finished area, sum to the reported gross living area, and confirm the sum matches the URAR's GLA field (1,847 sq ft as reported on this submission).

Advisory USPAP-SR1-3-MARKET-TRENDS

Market-condition adjustments are supported by trend analysis

USPAP Standards Rule 1-3 — market-area and trend analysis (applies to every assignment).

Comparable Sales #2 and #3 carry positive market-conditions adjustments of $4,500 and $9,200 respectively. The workfile's market_condition_adjustment_supported boolean is true (attested), but the supporting trend data is not referenced in the report. (advisory; consider but not required for compliance.)

Rules that passed

The 38 rules below fired against this submission and produced no findings. We show eight representative passes; the remaining thirty are listed in the full Evaluation Report.

  • WA-RCW-18.140-050-A — Appraiser must hold an active certification
  • WA-WAC-308-125-200-USPAP-EDITION — USPAP edition referenced
  • USPAP-SR1-4-COMPS-MIN — At least three closed comparables
  • FED-FHA-4000-1-II-D-1-ROSTER-ELIGIBILITY — Appraiser on the FHA roster
  • FED-FHA-4000-1-II-D-3-PHOTO-FRONT-EXTERIOR — Front-exterior photograph included
  • FED-FHA-4000-1-II-D-4-FEMA-FLOOD-ZONE — FEMA flood zone identified (Zone X — minimal risk)
  • FED-FHA-4000-1-II-D-5-FOUNDATION-STRUCTURAL — Foundation / structural elements assessed
  • FED-FHA-4000-1-II-D-6-FHA-CERTIFICATION — FHA-specific certification present
  • … and 30 more.

4. Improvement guidance — ranked

The recommendations below are the consolidated, ranked list of actions to take before resubmitting this workfile. The order follows severity (critical → material → advisory) and within severity, chronological order in your workflow.

  1. Add lead-based-paint assessment to the URAR addendum critical

    Pre-1978 construction triggers FHA II.D.5. Select one of: no defective paint observed; defective paint documented with repair plan; defective paint without repair plan (this third option blocks FHA insurance). Photograph any observed defects.

    Driven by: FED-FHA-4000-1-II-D-5-LEAD-PAINT.

  2. Replace Comp #3 or add an age-justification narrative material

    Comparable Sale #3 is 16 months old. Either swap in a sale closed within the last 12 months from the West Bremerton submarket, or document in the addendum why this older sale is more similar than alternatives.

    Driven by: FED-FHA-4000-1-II-D-3-COMPARABLE-RECENCY.

  3. Declare the ANSI Z765 method and add the GLA calculation exhibit material

    State that GLA was measured under ANSI Z765-2021 and show per-area dimensions summing to the reported 1,847 sq ft GLA. Can be added to the existing sketch as marginal annotation or as a separate exhibit page.

    Driven by: ANSI-Z765-METHOD-DECLARED.

  4. Reference the supporting trend data for market-conditions adjustments advisory

    Comps #2 and #3 carry positive market-conditions adjustments. Consider citing the West Bremerton 12-month rolling price trend (Form 1004MC or equivalent) in the addendum so the adjustments are inspector-defensible.

    Driven by: USPAP-SR1-3-MARKET-TRENDS.

This is an Evaluation Report — a point-in-time compliance check. It shows what was checked, when, and against which rules, and what came back. Run the same file against the same rules and you get the same findings. It is not a sealed, verifiable Decision Record (that's the Assemble product), and it is not an outside confirmation that the appraisal itself is correct — the findings support your professional judgment, they don't replace it.

Athena Systems North Star — sample evaluation v1.0. This is a software-generated Evaluation Report built from a stand-in example. Nothing on this page is a real appraisal or a real submission.

What you just read

That's the whole deliverable for one check. You get an Evaluation Report like this every time you run a workfile through North Star — on screen and as a PDF, ready to file away or hand to a reviewer.

The layout is the same on every Evaluation Report:

  • Sections 1–2 give the assignment background and a summary of what was checked.
  • Section 3 is the day-to-day value: findings with citations and step-by-step fixes for each one, plus the rules that passed.
  • Section 4 ranks the fixes so you know what to tackle first.
  • The closing note is the safety net: what the check does and does not tell you.

Want one of these for your next assignment?

North Star is open to Washington and Oregon appraisers. Sign up, run your first check, and get an Evaluation Report like this one.

Sign up